Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ãø¸ð »çÁø»ó¿¡¼­ SubnasaleÀÇ ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ÁÖ°üÀû Æò°¡

Subjective Evaluation about Ideal Position of the Subnasale on Lateral Photos

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2013³â 29±Ç 4È£ p.347 ~ 358
±èÀ̵¿, Á¤µ¿È­, Â÷°æ¼®, ÀÌÁø¿ì, ÀÌ»ó¹Î,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀ̵¿ ( Kim Yi-dong ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
Á¤µ¿È­ ( Jung Dong-Hwa ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
Â÷°æ¼® ( Cha Kyung-Suk ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÁø¿ì ( Lee Jin-Woo ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
ÀÌ»ó¹Î ( Lee Sang-Min ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract

Ãø¸ðÀÇ ¿¬Á¶Á÷ ºÐ¼® ½Ã Subnasale´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ±âÁØÁ¡À¸·Î »ç¿ëµÇÁö¸¸ ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â µå¹°´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº Çѱ¹ÀÎ Ãø¸ð¿¡¼­ SubnasaleÀÇ À§Ä¡ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ½É¹ÌÀû ¾È¸ð¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °´°üÀû ±âÁØÀ» Á¦½Ã ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̸ç, Ãß°¡ÀûÀ¸·Î Àü¹®°¡ Áý´Ü°ú ÀÏ¹Ý ´ëÁß °£ÀÇ ¾È¸ð ¼±È£µµ ÀνĿ¡ ¾î¶² Â÷ÀÌ°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´ÂÁö Æò°¡ ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
À̹ø ¿¬±¸¸¦ À§ÇØ Ã¤µæÇÑ 20´ë ¿©¼º »çÁø Áß¿¡¼­ Àü¹®°¡¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °áÁ¤µÈ ÀûÀýÇÑ Ãø¸é ¾È¸ð ºñÀ²·Î ÆǴܵǴ 1¸íÀÇ Ãø¸ð »çÁøÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼±Á¤µÈ »çÁøÀº ºñ¼ø°¢À» À¯ÁöÇϸç Áø¼º ¼öÁ÷¼±¿¡ ¼öÁ÷ÇÑ Æò¸é»ó¿¡¼­ SubnasaleÀ» Àü, ÈĹæÀ¸·Î º¯È­½ÃÄ×´Ù. ÇÕ¼ºµÈ »çÁøÀº Àü¹®°¡ Áý´Ü(±³Á¤ÀÇ»ç 9¸í)°ú ÀÏ¹Ý ´ëÁß(126¸í)¿¡°Ô Á¦½ÃµÇ¾î °¢°¢ÀǼ±È£µµ¸¦ VAS»ó¿¡ Ç¥½ÃÇϵµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ÙÀ½ÀÇ °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. SubnasaleÀÇ ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡´Â Lateral canthus~Subnasale : Subnasale~Pronasale°¡ 1.769 : 1À» ÀÌ·ê ¶§ ÀÌ´Ù.
2. °¢µµ»ó NasionÀ» Åë°úÇÏ´Â Áø¼º ¼öÁ÷¼±°ú Subnasale°¡ 5.5??¸¦ ÀÌ·ê ¶§ ÀÌ´Ù.
3. Àü¹®°¡ Áý´ÜÀº ¸ðµç ºñÀ² º¯È­¸¦ ÀÎÁöÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ÀÏ¹Ý ´ëÁßÀº 1.571 : 1°ú 1.769 : 1 »çÀÌÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÀÎÁöÇÏÁö
¸øÇÏ¿´´Ù.

When analyzing soft tissue of the profile, Subnasale is often used as an important reference point. But there are few
studies on the ideal position of the Subnasale. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to present an objective reference of
the esthetic face relating to the change of Subnasale position in Koreans¡¯ profile, and also to determine whether there is
concordance between professionals and laypersons in their perception of facial attractiveness.
The one determined as appropriate profile portion by experts of pictures taken in women in 20s was selected. The
photograph was modified changing the Subnasale anteroposteriorly on the plane perpendicular to the true vertical line,
while maintaining the nasolabial angle. The photographs were presented to a group of professionals (9 orthodontists) and
126 laypersons, who were asked to assess the facial attractiveness of the photographs on a VAS independently.
The conclusion was obtained.
1. The ideal position of the Subnasale is when the ratio of the distance Lateral canthus~Subnasale : Subnasale~
Pronasale is 1.769 : 1.
2. The ideal degrees between the true vertical line passing through Nasion and Subnasale is 5.5??
3. The professionals recognized every change in the ratio, but the laypersons couldn¡¯t differentiate between the change
from 1.571 : 1 to 1.769 : 1.

Å°¿öµå

Ãø¸ð ¿¬Á¶Á÷ ºÐ¼®; Subnasale; VASÆò°¡
Soft tissue of the profile; Subnasale; Visual analogue scale

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI